The strategy exists. The leadership is committed. The window is open. What's been missing is a system that fits inside your real calendar — and keeps working after we leave. In 90 days we diagnose your organization and build a live AI decision support system. You receive both: the Executive Report and the system that makes it actionable. You own everything. The system operates daily from Day 91.
At Day 90 you receive two things: an Executive Report and a live AI decision support system your leaders use daily. The system is what makes the report actionable — and what keeps working after we leave. Here is what the system can contain, depending on your organization's maturity level:
An AI advisor operating under the DiaCroma formal behavioral framework. It knows your organization's p_cap × p_will × p_coord execution profile, which leader is the coordination bottleneck, and what restructured action plan actually gets executed. You ask it questions. It produces specific, evidence-based next steps — not encouragement.
Your organization's own documents — strategy, committee minutes, COPAES/JC/CMS preparation reports, AI governance drafts — searchable by the AI. The system knows what's in your SharePoint, what your committees have approved, and what the gaps between your stated strategy and your current AI posture actually are.
All findings from the 90-day diagnostic — classified by severity (CRITICAL, URGENT, MODERATE, OPPORTUNITY, STRENGTH, PENDING), linked to each other, and queryable. The system knows what was found in which department, what the dependency chain is, and in what order issues must be resolved.
Live sector intelligence calibrated to your exact institution type — not generic industry reports. A regional hospital in Monterrey gets Mexican NOM and COFEPRIS context. A private university gets COPAES/FIMPES benchmarks and peer institution signals. A pharma CRO gets GxP and ICH E6 framing. Updated continuously.
A synthesis engine that continuously consolidates findings across terminals, produces a daily executive summary, and flags when new evidence changes the priority order. Your team curates findings — approve, edit, or discard — and the system learns from every decision.
From Day 91, every interaction is logged and evaluated. The critic agent scores each response — useful, partial, or failed — and sends improvement signals to the central system. The prompts powering your system improve automatically with every use. No re-engagement required. The system that knew your organization on Day 90 knows it better on Day 180.
See the demos before you decide.
The demo page shows three live demonstrations — DiaCroma running against a real institutional crisis, Level07 showing what the destination looks like, and VeritRX showing how we extend into existing systems. One hour. Your questions. No commitment.
Everything produced in 90 days becomes a structured, client-owned asset — and all four outputs are assembled into the Day 90 system.
Department-by-department mapping across all 10 VeritAI dimensions: data foundation, EHR/core systems integration, agent deployment, autonomy tier, governance maturity, integration architecture, human role configuration, outcomes measurement, technology stack alignment, and active actor coverage. Each cell is evidence-based — not self-reported. The matrix also produces your risk appetite determination: where your organization should stop. Not every organization should target L7. Most shouldn't. The diagnostic tells you where to stop as clearly as it tells you where you are.
10 dimensions · Per department · Risk ceiling includedEvery AI and data platform currently deployed mapped against the level07 architecture — identifying misplacements (tools deployed before the foundation that enables them), gaps (tools absent that your current level requires), and vendor contract exposures. A LangChain RAG layer running on fragmented, un-normalized data is not a Level 4 asset. It's a liability. The audit names exactly what's producing false confidence and what's missing.
Misplacements identified · Gaps · Vendor exposuresFor each key stakeholder who must drive or approve the program: p_cap × p_will × p_coord measured, execution probability calculated, dominant bottleneck identified, and a restructured action plan produced. These profiles aren't a coaching document — they are embedded in the Day 90 system. When your CIO asks the system a question, it already knows their execution constraints.
p_cap × p_will × p_coord · Per leader · Restructured action planA CFO-ready ROI framework tied to the financial mechanisms active at your current level — not generic estimates. At L1: 1–3 hours per clinician per shift recovered. At L2: 1 point in denial rate recovery on a $2B system = $20M. At L3: ALOS reduction measurable in 90 days. At L4: 5–15% unnecessary order reduction. At L5: sepsis detection 4–6 hours earlier. Built from your actual metrics, not industry averages.
Level-specific mechanisms · Your metrics · CFO-readyWe don't ask you to stop running your organization. Sessions are 60–90 minutes per leader per week, pre-scheduled, agenda-driven, with a defined output. We prepare everything in advance. You receive outputs, not homework.
Stakeholder interviews with clinical, operational, financial, and IT leadership. Shadow AI inventory — every ungoverned tool, classified by regulatory exposure. Data foundation assessment. Technology stack audit against level07 architecture.
10-dimension maturity matrix completed per department. Risk appetite determination: your appropriate ceiling level. Per-leader behavioral profiles. Peer benchmarking: where institutions of your exact type are operating.
Sequenced first deployment phase: specific initiatives, defined owners, governance gates, measurable outcomes. Level-specific financial model tied to your actual revenue and cost structure. Implementation governance framework — the L0 architecture that makes every AI investment defensible.
All findings, profiles, and industry intelligence assembled into the live decision support system. AI agents configured with your organization's specific context, terminology, regulatory environment, and leadership constraints. Critic agent initialized. Your team starts using the system before Day 90 — so the handoff is a transition, not a delivery.
Every AI transformation eventually hits the same wall: a leader who cannot move. Not because they lack vision — but because the capacity isn't there, or the willingness isn't fully resolved, or the coordination structure around them prevents action.
DiaCroma is a formal mathematical framework — 14 findings — that measures each variable per leader and per team. It produces a specific, restructured action plan. Not encouragement. Not a coaching document. A plan that gets executed.
Every DiaCroma session in the 90-day engagement feeds the Day 90 system. The per-leader profiles are embedded in the live environment — so the system knows your people, not just your processes.
This is the layer no other AI consulting firm has. It is why Verit Global Labs engagements produce transformation, not reports.
Explore DiaCroma →Reference vs regional. US vs Spain/MX. Epic vs Oracle. OCR/CMS/Joint Commission/NOM-COFEPRIS exposure. Clinical vs operational deployment sequencing.
Flagship research vs private tuition-driven. COPAES/FIMPES/SACSCOC/QS accreditation context. Faculty adoption curve. Student continuity analytics.
GxP/CSV/ICH E6 validation requirements. Clinical trial data integrity. Sponsor vs CRO AI governance boundaries. Inspection-readiness posture.
Basel/DORA/MiCA regulatory posture. Payment verification deterministic layer (VeritOS). Fraud detection without hallucination.
A 30–60 minute conversation that produces a preliminary maturity estimate, an initial shadow AI inventory, and an honest answer to whether a full 90-day diagnostic is the right next step right now.
No commitment required.